Legislator Case Law & Legislation
90.2002.72 • TRPI TI 90.2002.72 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal Following Agreement

Case Number 90.2002.72
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal on May 21, 2002, challenging a State Council decision from April 17, 2002, which approved a regulatory plan. The court noted that during a hearing on March 10, 2004, the parties agreed to withdraw the procedure, thereby concluding the matter. Consequently, the court ordered the appeal to be struck from the roll, with no collection of fees, expenses, or costs awarded to either party.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal Following Agreement: The court noted that during a hearing on March 10, 2004, the parties agreed to withdraw the procedure, thereby concluding the matter. Consequently, the court ordered the appeal to be struck from the roll, with no collection of fees, expenses, or costs awarded to either party.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of legal petition hearing of the parties dismissal or termination of contract right of removal appealable interlocutory decision duration of judicial expulsion Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order dictates that no fees or costs shall be levied.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2002.72 · Lugano 15 marzo 2004 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Raffaello Balerna

assistito dal segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 21 maggio 2002 di

__________ _ __________ patr. da: avv.__________ __________ contro

la decisione 17 aprile 2002 (n__________) con cui il Consiglio di Stato ha approvato il piano regolatore di __________;

ritenuto che, con le precisazioni elencate nel verbale d'udienza 10 marzo 2004, le parti hanno dato la loro adesione allo stralcio della procedura;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;

decreta:

1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

Non si assegnano ripetibili.

3. Intimazione a: · ; .

Il presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio · Il segretario