Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2002.65 • TRPI TI 90.2002.65 AI generated

Appeal of Forest Boundary Decision Withdrawn

Case Number 90.2002.65
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal on April 17, 2002, challenging a state council decision from March 26, 2002, that established the boundary between forest land and buildable area in a municipality. The court decreed the appeal struck from the rolls because the appellant, through their representative, notified the court via letter on January 21, 2003, that they were withdrawing the challenge, resulting in no collection of taxes or fees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2.Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Appeal of Forest Boundary Decision Withdrawn: The court decreed the appeal struck from the rolls because the appellant, through their representative, notified the court via letter on January 21, 2003, that they were withdrawing the challenge, resulting in no collection of taxes or fees.

Keywords

AI generated
tree removal order withdrawal of petition action for boundary determination zoning exclusion right of removal nature conservation permit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2.Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This order rules on the non-levying of procedural costs (taxes and expenses).
AI generated
90.2002.71
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal in Forest Boundary Dispute
90.1998.45
Appeal Withdrawal in Forest Boundary Dispute
90.2000.29
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Forest Boundary Demarcation
90.2003.77
Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Forest Boundary Decision

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This order rules on the non-levying of procedural costs (taxes and expenses).

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2002.65 · Lugano 22 gennaio 2003 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Raffaello Balerna assistito dal segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi statuendo sul ricorso del 17 aprile 2002 di __________ __________ __________, __________ __________ rappr. da: studio legale __________ & __________, __________ __________ contro la decisione 26 marzo 2002 (n. __________) con cui il Consiglio di Stato ha accertato il limite del bosco a confine con l'area edificabile del comune di __________;

preso atto che, con lettera 21 gennaio 2003, il

rappresentante del ricorrente ha comunicato al Tribunale di ritirare l’impugnativa;

decreta

1. Il

ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2.Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3.

Intimazione a: · -

__________ __________ __________, __________ __________ rappr. dallo studio legale __________ & __________,Via __________ __________ __________, __________ __________ - Municipio di __________, ____________________ - Divisione della pianificazione territoriale, __________ __________. __________ __________, ____________________ - Consiglio di Stato, Residenza governativa, ____ ____________ Il presidente del Il segretario Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio