Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2002.20 • TRPI TI 90.2002.20 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal

Case Number 90.2002.20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The applicants filed an appeal challenging a governmental body's resolution that approved a municipality's zoning plan. During the hearing, the representative for the appellants informed the court that they were withdrawing the appeal. Consequently, the court ordered the removal of the case from the docket, ruling that no fees or costs would be levied against the parties.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal: During the hearing, the representative for the appellants informed the court that they were withdrawing the appeal. Consequently, the court ordered the removal of the case from the docket, ruling that no fees or costs would be levied against the parties.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of legal petition removal hearing of the parties standing to appeal administrative dismissal removal expenses
AI generated
90.2002.167
Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal
90.1998.102
Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal
90.2001.120
Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal
52.2001.21
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal
90.1994.252
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

This item is the primary order stralcing (withdrawing) the appeal from the roll after the appellant communicated the withdrawal.

2.

This item orders that no fees or expenses be collected, addressing procedural costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2002.00020 · Lugano 26 settembre 2002 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Raffaello Balerna assistito dal segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 15 gennaio 2002 di

1. __________ __________, __________,

2. __________ __________, __________,

patr. da avv. __________. __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione 16 ottobre 2001 no. __________con cui il Consiglio di Stato ha approvato il piano regolatore del comune di __________;

preso atto che, all'udienza del 25 settembre 2002, il rappresentante dei ricorrenti ha comunicato al Tribunale di ritirare l’impugnativa;

decreta

1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________ __________, __________ e __________ __________, __________ rappr. da __________

- Municipio di __________, __________ __________, __________ __________

- Consiglio di Stato, Residenza Governativa, ____________________

- Divisione della pianificazione territoriale, ______ ____________ __, ____ __________

Il presidente Il segretario

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio