Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2002.2 • TRPI TI 90.2002.2 AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal

Case Number 90.2002.2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dealt with an appeal filed against the approval of a municipality's regulatory plan by the State Council. The appellant, through their representative, communicated the withdrawal of the appeal by letter prior to the ruling. Consequently, the court ordered the appeal to be struck from the roll without imposing any fees or expenses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2.Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal: The appellant, through their representative, communicated the withdrawal of the appeal by letter prior to the ruling. Consequently, the court ordered the appeal to be struck from the roll without imposing any fees or expenses.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of legal petition standing to appeal right of removal administrative revocation of decision subrogation of the public authority judicial review Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2.Non si prelevano tasse e spese
The dispositive explicitly orders that no fees or costs are to be collected.
AI generated
90.1996.72
Appeal Struck After Withdrawal of Challenge
90.2003.46
Appeal Dismissed Due to Withdrawal
90.1997.25
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal
90.2000.62
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal
90.2003.86
Municipality Regulatory Plan Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

The dispositive explicitly orders that no fees or costs are to be collected.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2002.2 · Lugano 15 aprile 2003 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Raffaello Balerna assistito dal segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi statuendo sul ricorso del 2 gennaio 2002 di __________ __________, __________ __________ rappr. da: avv. __________ __________ __________, __________ __________ __________ __________ contro la decisione 13 novembre 2001 (n. __________) con cui il Consiglio di Stato ha approvato il piano regolatore del comune di __________;

preso atto che, con lettera 14 aprile 2003, il

rappresentante del ricorrente ha comunicato al Tribunale di ritirare l’impugnativa;

decreta

1. Il

ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2.Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3.

Intimazione a: · -

__________ __________, __________ __________

rappr. da avv. __________ __________ __________, Via

_________ __________, ____________________ ____________________

-

Municipio di __________, ____________________ -

Divisione della pianificazione territoriale, ___________. __________ __________, __________ - Consiglio di Stato, Residenza governativa, ____ ___________ Per il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Il presidente Il segretario