Legislator Case Law & Legislation
90.2002.166 • TRPI TI 90.2002.166 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal and Striking of Case Record

Case Number 90.2002.166
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal on December 12, 2002, challenging a State Council decision from November 5, 2002, which approved certain variations to the regulatory plan of PI 1 for a specific section. The court noted that the appellant communicated the withdrawal of the appeal on behalf of themselves and other co-litigants on January 10, 2005, leading the court to conclude the proceedings were exhausted and therefore ordered the appeal to be struck from the record, with no fees or costs to be charged.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal and Striking of Case Record: The court noted that the appellant communicated the withdrawal of the appeal on behalf of themselves and other co-litigants on January 10, 2005, leading the court to conclude the proceedings were exhausted and therefore ordered the appeal to be struck from the record, with no fees or costs to be charged.

Keywords

AI generated
charging of fees withdrawal of legal petition lead proceedings appealable interlocutory decision party costs duration of judicial expulsion Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order states that no fees or costs shall be levied, which relates to the financial disposition of the case.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2002.166 · Lugano 24 gennaio 2005 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Raffaello Balerna

assistito dal segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 12 dicembre 2002 di

RI 1 contro

la decisione 5 novembre 2002 (n. 5144) con cui il Consiglio di Stato ha approvato alcune varianti del piano regolatore del PI 1, sezione di __________;

preso atto che il 10 gennaio 2005 il ricorrente, per sé e per gli altri litisconsorti, ha comunicato di ritirare il ricorso;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;

decreta:

1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

3. Intimazione a:

terzi implicati · PI 1 rappr. da: RA 2 CO 1 rappr. da: RA 1 Il presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio · Il segretario