Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2001.69 • TRPI TI 90.2001.69 AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge to Forest Boundary Determination

Case Number 90.2001.69
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Territorial Planning Tribunal addressed an appeal filed against a State Council resolution concerning the determination of the forest boundary adjacent to a buildable zone within a municipality. The court noted that the appellant formally withdrew the challenge via a letter dated March 25, 2002, leading the court to conclude that the matter was moot. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered the appeal to be struck from the record and dispensed with the assessment of fees and costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge to Forest Boundary Determination: The court noted that the appellant formally withdrew the challenge via a letter dated March 25, 2002, leading the court to conclude that the matter was moot. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered the appeal to be struck from the record and dispensed with the assessment of fees and costs.

Keywords

AI generated
action for boundary determination tree removal order standing to appeal right of removal planning costs withdrawal of petition Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.2001.27
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Forest Boundary Designation
90.2002.78
Complainant Withdraws Appeal Against State Council Forest Boundary Determination
90.1998.94
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge to Forest Zone Designation
90.2001.31
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Forest Line Determination
90.1997.188
Withdrawal of Appeal Concerning Forest Boundary Delimitation

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

The dispositive order explicitly states that no fees or expenses are to be collected.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2001.00069 · Lugano 26 marzo 2002 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Lorenzo Anastasi, Raffaello Balerna Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 24 ottobre 2001 di

__________ __________ -__________, __________, contro

la risoluzione __________ottobre 2001 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato, accertamento del limite del bosco a contatto con la zona edificabile nel comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 29 gennaio 2002 del Consiglio di Stato;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 25 marzo 2002 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario