Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2001.54 • TRPI TI 90.2001.54 AI generated

Local Authority Appeal Withdrawal in Master Plan Revision Case

Case Number 90.2001.54
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A local authority filed an appeal against a State Council resolution that approved the revision of the municipal master plan and detailed neighborhood plans. During the hearing, the appellant formally withdrew the challenge, which rendered the case moot. Consequently, the court struck the appeal from the record without assessing costs or fees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Local Authority Appeal Withdrawal in Master Plan Revision Case: During the hearing, the appellant formally withdrew the challenge, which rendered the case moot. Consequently, the court struck the appeal from the record without assessing costs or fees.

Keywords

AI generated
local authority revision of spatial plan planning permission variance standing against building permit town-planning scheme withdrawal of revision request Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1995.87
Appeal Against Municipal Master Plan Amendments Withdrawn
90.2003.50
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Master Plan Revision
90.1998.150
Appeal of Master Plan Resolution Withdrawn
90.1998.130
Appeal of Municipality Master Plan Withdrawn
90.1996.102
Appeal Struck After Withdrawal of Challenge to Municipal Master Plan

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

This item, although not a provision, is the procedural order stating the main action taken (striking the appeal from the roll) because the case became moot.

2.

This item is the procedural order exempting the parties from paying fees and costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2001.00054 · Lugano 19 settembre 2001 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Lorenzo Anastasi, Raffaello Balerna Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 5 ottobre 2000 di

Comune di __________, __________, rappr. da: Municipio di __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione __________luglio 2000 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la revisione del Piano Regolatore comunale e dei Piani Particolareggiati dei nuclei del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all'udienza 18 settembre 2001 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a:

- Municipio di __________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario