Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2001.4 • TRPI TI 90.2001.4 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal and Striking of Case

Case Number 90.2001.4
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal on January 12, 2001, challenging a Grand Council decision from March 1999 that approved a general plan for the correction of a cantonal road and the construction of a new pass within a specific regional plan. However, the court noted that the appellant's representative declared the withdrawal of the appeal by letter on August 20, 2001, leading the court to rule that the matter was moot and therefore ordered the appeal to be struck from the record, with no assessment of court fees or expenses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal and Striking of Case: However, the court noted that the appellant's representative declared the withdrawal of the appeal by letter on August 20, 2001, leading the court to rule that the matter was moot and therefore ordered the appeal to be struck from the record, with no assessment of court fees or expenses.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of legal petition appealable interlocutory decision right of removal duration of judicial expulsion administrative revocation of decision judicial review Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1994.212
Appeal Withdrawal and Striking of Case
90.1998.28
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal
35.2001.20
Appeal Withdrawal Leading to Case Dismissal
90.2002.166
Appeal Withdrawal and Striking of Case Record
50.2000.9
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

The decision explicitly orders the appeal to be removed from the rolls because it became moot.

2.

The decision orders that no fees or costs be levied in connection with the removed appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2001.00004 · Lugano 21 agosto 2001 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Lorenzo Anastasi, Raffaello Balerna

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 12 gennaio 2001 di

__________ __________, __________,

rappr. da: avv. __________ __________, __________ __________ __________ __________, contro

la decisione __________marzo 1999 del Gran Consiglio approvante il Piano generale relativo alla correzione della strada cantonale __________ e la costruzione del nuovo valico del __________, nell'ambito del __________ __________ __________;

viste le osservazioni 16 maggio 2001 dei Servizi Generali del DT;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 20 agosto 2001 il rappresentante del ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - Avv. __________ __________, __________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Dipartimento del territorio, amministrazione immobiliare e strade nazionali, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario