Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2001.35 • TRPI TI 90.2001.35 AI generated

Appeal Dismissed Due to Withdrawal of Challenge to Local Development Plan Refusal

Case Number 90.2001.35
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party appealed a State Council resolution that refused to approve zones for private constructions of public interest (AEPP) within a municipality's revised local development plan; however, the court dismissed the appeal and struck it from the record because the appellant formally communicated their decision to withdraw the challenge prior to the hearing, resulting in no court fees or expenses being levied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Dismissed Due to Withdrawal of Challenge to Local Development Plan Refusal: A party appealed a State Council resolution that refused to approve zones for private constructions of public interest (AEPP) within a municipality's revised local development plan; however, the court dismissed the appeal and struck it from the record because the appellant formally communicated their decision to withdraw the challenge prior to the hearing, resulting in no court fees or expenses being levied.

Keywords

AI generated
deemed withdrawal of opposition standing against building permit hearing of the parties planning approval revocation of settlement permit decision not to raise objections Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1998.118
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Local Development Plan Approval
90.2003.55
Appeal Dismissed After Withdrawal of Zoning Challenge
90.2000.41
Appeal Withdrawn and Case Dismissed
90.1995.144
Withdrawal of Appeal Against State Council Resolution Upheld
90.1997.63
Appeal Dismissed Upon Appellant's Withdrawal of Zoning Plan Challenge

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

The appeal was removed from the rolls because the appellant withdrew the claim.

2.

No fees or costs shall be levied.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2001.00035 · Lugano 6 giugno 2002 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Raffaello Balerna assistito dal segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso dell'11 maggio 2001 della

contro

la risoluzione __________aprile 2001 no. __________del Consiglio di Stato mediante la quale è stata decisa la non approvazione delle zone per costruzioni private di interesse pubblico AEPP (comparto C e comparto E) nel PR (revisione '97) del Comune di __________;

preso atto che, con lettera 5 giugno 2002, il rappresentante della ricorrente ha comunicato al Tribunale di ritirare l’impugnativa;

decreta

1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse né spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Il presidente Il segretario

del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio