Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2001.29 • TRPI TI 90.2001.29 AI generated

Appeal of Municipal Regulatory Plan Amendment Struck Due to Withdrawal

Case Number 90.2001.29
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party appealed a resolution by the State Council approving an amendment to a Municipal Regulatory Plan concerning the inventory of buildings located outside designated building zones. The Court determined that the cause of action had become moot because the appellant explicitly withdrew their challenge during the hearing. Consequently, the court ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls, with no fees or costs assessed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal of Municipal Regulatory Plan Amendment Struck Due to Withdrawal: The Court determined that the cause of action had become moot because the appellant explicitly withdrew their challenge during the hearing. Consequently, the court ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls, with no fees or costs assessed.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of action approval of municipal regulations hearing of the parties standing against building permit legislative amendment absence of municipal obligation Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1996.87
Appeal Withdrawal in Municipal Plan Amendment Dispute
90.2001.28
Appeal Dismissal Due to Withdrawal of Challenge Against Regulatory Plan Amendment
90.2002.155
Appeal Withdrawal and Striking of Case Regarding Municipal Regulatory Plan Decision
90.1995.11
Appeal Against Municipal Regulatory Plan Struck Upon Withdrawal
90.2003.86
Municipality Regulatory Plan Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

This order dictates the removal of the appeal from the rolls because the case became moot.

2.

This order dictates that no fees or expenses are to be levied, addressing the costs aspect of the ruling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2001.00029 · Lugano 27 settembre 2001 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Lorenzo Anastasi, Raffaello Balerna Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 20 aprile 2001 di

__________ e __________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione __________aprile 2001 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la variante di Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________ concernente l'inventario degli edifici situati fuori zone edificabili;

viste le osservazioni 7 agosto 2001 del Consiglio di Stato e 20 luglio 2001 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all'udienza 27 settembre 2001 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - _________ _________, _________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario