Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2001.120 • TRPI TI 90.2001.120 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal

Case Number 90.2001.120
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

Several parties filed an appeal against the resolution of the State Council approving the regulatory plan of a specific municipality. During the hearing, the representative for the appellants informed the court that they were withdrawing the challenge. Consequently, the court ordered the appeal to be struck from the records and waived any collection of fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal: During the hearing, the representative for the appellants informed the court that they were withdrawing the challenge. Consequently, the court ordered the appeal to be struck from the records and waived any collection of fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
hearing of the parties withdrawal of legal petition right of removal subrogation of the public authority appealable interlocutory decision administrative dismissal Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1998.102
Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal
90.2004.48
Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal
90.2003.46
Appeal Dismissed Due to Withdrawal
90.2002.167
Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal
90.2002.20
Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This provision dictates that no fees or expenses shall be levied, which pertains to cost allocation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2001.00120 · Lugano 12 settembre 2002 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Raffaello Balerna assistito dal segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi statuendo sul ricorso del 21 dicembre 2001 di

1. __________ __________, __________,

2. CE __________ __________, __________,

3. __________, __________ e __________ __________, __________,

4. __________. __________ __________ di __________ e __________, __________,

5. __________ e __________ __________, __________,

6. CE __________ __________, __________,

7. __________ __________, __________,

8. __________ __________, ,

9. __________ e __________ __________, __________,

1.,2.,3.,4.,5.,6.,7.,8.,9. Dr. __________. __________, __________ __________, contro la risoluzione 16 ottobre 2002 no. __________ con cui il Consiglio di Stato ha approvato il piano regolatore del comune di __________ preso atto che, all'udienza dell'11 settembre 2002, il rappresentante dei ricorrenti ha comunicato al Tribunale di ritirare l'impugnativa;

decreta

1. Il ricorso

è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si

prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di __________

- Consiglio di Stato, __________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il

segretario