Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2000.9 • TRPI TI 90.2000.9 AI generated

Appeal Struck as Moot Following State Council Reversal

Case Number 90.2000.9
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party appealed a State Council resolution approving an inventory of buildings located outside the buildable zone of a municipality; however, because the State Council subsequently agreed with the appeal, the matter became moot, leading the Territorial Planning Tribunal to strike the appeal from the rolls without imposing fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Struck as Moot Following State Council Reversal: A party appealed a State Council resolution approving an inventory of buildings located outside the buildable zone of a municipality; however, because the State Council subsequently agreed with the appeal, the matter became moot, leading the Territorial Planning Tribunal to strike the appeal from the rolls without imposing fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
standing against building permit planning costs standing to appeal authorities' referendum state property removal of attached property Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1996.115
Appeal Moot Due to Subsequent Council Resolution
90.1998.132
Appeal of State Council Resolution Withdrawn; Case Moot
90.1999.29
Moot Appeal of Municipal Building Inventory
90.2000.7
Appeal Moot Due to Subsequent Concessions
90.1997.146
Municipality v. State Council: Spatial Planning Revision Appeal Struck Due to Mootness

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order dictates that no fees or expenses are to be levied, which is a procedural ruling on costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2000.00009 · Lugano 7 aprile 2000 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 31 gennaio 2000 di

__________ __________ __________, __________, rappr. da: Municipio di __________, __________ __________, Contro

la risoluzione 14 dicembre 1999 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva l'inventario degli edifici ubicati fuori zona edificabile del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 27 marzo 2000 del Consiglio di Stato;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che il Consiglio di Stato ha aderito al ricorso;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - Municipio di __________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario