Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2000.83 • TRPI TI 90.2000.83 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Regulatory Plan Challenge

Case Number 90.2000.83
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal challenging a State Council resolution that approved a regulatory plan amendment concerning an inventory of buildings situated outside buildable zones within a municipality. During the hearing, the appellant declared the withdrawal of the challenge, leading the court to determine that the matter had become moot. Consequently, the court ordered the appeal to be removed from the register, deciding that no fees or expenses would be charged.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Regulatory Plan Challenge: During the hearing, the appellant declared the withdrawal of the challenge, leading the court to determine that the matter had become moot. Consequently, the court ordered the appeal to be removed from the register, deciding that no fees or expenses would be charged.

Keywords

AI generated
charging of fees withdrawal of petition hearing of the parties procedural objections appealable interlocutory decision standing against building permit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1998.121
Mootness of Appeal Regarding Regulatory Plan Amendment After Withdrawal
90.2001.28
Appeal Dismissal Due to Withdrawal of Challenge Against Regulatory Plan Amendment
90.1996.6
Appeal Withdrawal in Regulatory Plan Challenge
90.1994.283
Appeal Moot Due to Withdrawal of Challenge
90.2003.51
Appeal Struck Due to Mootness Following Withdrawal Consent

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

This order dictates the removal of the appeal from the court records due to its withdrawal.

2.

This order decides that no court fees or costs are to be collected.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2000.00083 · Lugano 15 marzo 2001 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Lorenzo Anastasi, Raffaello Balerna

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 12 dicembre 2000 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione __________ottobre 2000 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la variante di Piano Regolatore concernente l'inventario degli edifici situati fuori dalle zone edificabili del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 9 febbraio 2001 del Consiglio di Stato e 24 gennaio 2001 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all'udienza 14 marzo 2001 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario