Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2000.58 • TRPI TI 90.2000.58 AI generated

Withdrawal of Appeal Against Cantonal Planning Zone Establishment

Case Number 90.2000.58
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal against a State Council decision that established a cantonal planning zone to safeguard studies related to priority projects outlined in the regional planning for several municipalities. The court noted that during the hearing, the appellant, through their representative, withdrew the appeal. Consequently, the court concluded that the proceedings were exhausted and decreed the appeal stricken from the record, with no fees or costs levied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 108 cpv. 2 LTF, Art. 66 cpv. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Against Cantonal Planning Zone Establishment: The court noted that during the hearing, the appellant, through their representative, withdrew the appeal. Consequently, the court concluded that the proceedings were exhausted and decreed the appeal stricken from the record, with no fees or costs levied.

Keywords

AI generated
planning costs zoning exclusion hearing of the parties zone subject to mandatory planning standing against building permit town-planning scheme Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 108 cpv. 2 LTF
Implied, as the court noted the case was concluded by withdrawal and did not impose costs or fees.
Art. 66 cpv. 1 LTF
Cited implicitly by the decision not to levy fees or costs.
AI generated
90.2000.49
Cantonal Planning Zone Appeal Struck After Withdrawal
90.1997.59
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Cantonal Regulatory Plan
90.2002.134
Appeal Withdrawal in Swiss Planning Zone Dispute

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 108 cpv. 2 LTF

Implied, as the court noted the case was concluded by withdrawal and did not impose costs or fees.

Art. 66 cpv. 1 LTF

Cited implicitly by the decision not to levy fees or costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2000.58 · Lugano 10 gennaio 2005 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Raffaello Balerna

assistito dal segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 25 settembre 2000 della

RI 1 patr. da: RA 1 contro

la decisione 27 giugno 2000 (n. 2771) con cui il Consiglio di Stato ha adottato una zona di pianificazione cantonale a salvaguardia degli studi relativi alla progettazione delle opere prioritarie previste nella pianificazione comprensoriale del __________ e concernente i comuni di __________, __________, __________, __________ e __________;

preso atto che in sede d'udienza 17 novembre 2004 la ricorrente, per il tramite del proprio patrocinatore, ha ritirato il ricorso;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;

decreta:

1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

3. Intimazione a:

terzi implicati · PI 1 rappr. da: RA 3 CO 1 rappr. da: RA 2 Il presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio · Il segretario