Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2000.42 • TRPI TI 90.2000.42 AI generated

Withdrawal of Challenge to Municipal Regulatory Plan Revision

Case Number 90.2000.42
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appeal was filed challenging the State Council's resolution approving the revision of the Municipal Regulatory Plan and specific zone plans for a municipality; however, during the hearing, the appellant formally withdrew the challenge, leading the Territorial Planning Tribunal to rule that the case had become moot and therefore ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls without the imposition of fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Withdrawal of Challenge to Municipal Regulatory Plan Revision: An appeal was filed challenging the State Council's resolution approving the revision of the Municipal Regulatory Plan and specific zone plans for a municipality; however, during the hearing, the appellant formally withdrew the challenge, leading the Territorial Planning Tribunal to rule that the case had become moot and therefore ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls without the imposition of fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
revision of zoning plan planning costs approval of municipal regulations town-planning scheme standing against building permit revocation of settlement permit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1996.6
Appeal Withdrawal in Regulatory Plan Challenge
90.1994.210
Withdrawal of Challenge to Municipal Regulatory Plan Approval
90.1996.118
Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Municipality Regulatory Plan Approval
90.2002.169
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Regulatory Plan Approval
90.2001.23
Withdrawal of Municipal Regulatory Plan Appeal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

The decision explicitly orders that no taxes or fees be collected in order 2.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2000.00042 · Lugano 19 settembre 2001 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Lorenzo Anastasi, Raffaello Balerna Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 13 settembre 2000 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione 11 luglio 2000 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la revisione del Piano Regolatore comunale e dei Piani Particolareggiati dei nuclei del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 26 luglio 2001 del Consiglio di Stato e 20 novembre 2000 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all'udienza 18 settembre 2001 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - _________ ________, _____________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario