Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2000.41 • TRPI TI 90.2000.41 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawn and Case Dismissed

Case Number 90.2000.41
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appeal was lodged against a State Council resolution approving the revision of the Municipal Development Plan and Detailed Zoning Plans for a specific municipality. The appellant subsequently declared at the hearing that they were withdrawing the challenge against the resolution, rendering the case moot. Consequently, the court struck the appeal from the record and ordered that no fees or costs be charged.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawn and Case Dismissed: The appellant subsequently declared at the hearing that they were withdrawing the challenge against the resolution, rendering the case moot. Consequently, the court struck the appeal from the record and ordered that no fees or costs be charged.

Keywords

AI generated
revision of zoning plan withdrawal of legal petition standing against building permit appealability of remand decision detailed development plan dismissal of traffic proceedings Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1995.17
Appeal Dismissed Upon Withdrawal of Challenge
90.2002.164
Appeal Withdrawn and Dismissed
90.2003.41
Appeal Dismissed Upon Appellant's Withdrawal
90.1994.109
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge
90.1996.72
Appeal Struck After Withdrawal of Challenge

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

The dispositive order explicitly states that no fees or expenses shall be charged.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2000.00041 · Lugano 19 settembre 2001 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Lorenzo Anastasi, Raffaello Balerna Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 13 settembre 2000 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione 11 luglio 2000 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la revisione del Piano Regolatore comunale e dei Piani Particolareggiati dei nuclei del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 26 luglio 2001 del Consiglio di Stato e 20 novembre 2000 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all'udienza 18 settembre 2001 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di __________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario