Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.2000.25 • TRPI TI 90.2000.25 AI generated

Territorial Planning Tribunal Rejects Appeal Against Municipal Decision

Case Number 90.2000.25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Territorial Planning Tribunal addressed an appeal filed against the decision of a municipal authority and the Division of Territorial Planning. The court's decision, after examining the facts and applicable law, was to reject the appeal, resulting in the appellant being held responsible for the judgment fee of 600 Swiss Francs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Territorial Planning Tribunal Rejects Appeal Against Municipal Decision: The court's decision, after examining the facts and applicable law, was to reject the appeal, resulting in the appellant being held responsible for the judgment fee of 600 Swiss Francs.

Keywords

AI generated
territorial law town-planning scheme municipal land standing against building permit zone subject to mandatory planning territorial restriction Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.2002.150
Municipality Appeal Dismissed in Planning Dispute
90.1998.67
Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision Dismissed
90.1998.59
Territorial Planning Tribunal Dismisses Appeal as Inadmissible
90.1999.79
Appeal Dismissed in Territorial Planning Dispute

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This procedural article governs the imposition of court fees on the appellant.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.2000.25 · Lugano 11 agosto 2000 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Raffaello Balerna, vicecancelliera, Lorenzo Anastasi,Werner Walser

statuendo sul ricorso del 29 febbraio 2000 di

1. __________e __________ __________, __________ __________ 2. ____________________ __________, __________ __________ 1, 2 rappr. da: avv. __________ __________ __________, __________ __________ __________ __________

contro

viste le risposte:

del Municipio di ;

della Divisione della pianificazione territoriale del Dipartimento del terrtorio;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

ritenuto

in fatto: A.

Per questi motivi,

visti gli articoli di legge applicabili alla fattispecie,

dichiara e pronuncia

1. Il ricorso è .

2.La tassa di giudizio, di fr. 600.--, è posta a carico del ricorrente.

3. Intimazione a: · -

- Municipio di - Divisione della pianificazione territoriale, Viale S. Franscini 17, 6501 Bellinzona - Consiglio di Stato, Residenza governativa, 6501 Bellinzona

Il presidente

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Il segretario