Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1999.42 • TRPI TI 90.1999.42 AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge Against Road Construction Plan

Case Number 90.1999.42
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A legal appeal was filed against the approval of a General Plan concerning the construction of a main road; however, during the hearing, the representative for the appellants formally withdrew the challenge, rendering the matter devoid of object, which led the Territorial Planning Court to order the appeal struck from the rolls without imposing any fees or expenses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge Against Road Construction Plan: A legal appeal was filed against the approval of a General Plan concerning the construction of a main road; however, during the hearing, the representative for the appellants formally withdrew the challenge, rendering the matter devoid of object, which led the Territorial Planning Court to order the appeal struck from the rolls without imposing any fees or expenses.

Keywords

AI generated
planning approval road construction standing against building permit withdrawal of legal petition dismissal of traffic proceedings provisional setting aside of opposition Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This part of the dispositive rules on the non-collection of fees and costs.
AI generated
90.2000.2
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal Regarding Traffic Plan Variation
90.2001.2
Appeal of Road Correction Plan Withdrawn
90.1999.52
Appeal Withdrawal and Striking of General Plan Challenge
90.1998.98
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge
90.2001.4
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Cantonal Road Plan Approval

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This part of the dispositive rules on the non-collection of fees and costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.1999.00042 · Lugano 3 novembre 1999 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 2 luglio 1999 di

__________ e __________ __________, __________, rappr. da: avv. __________ __________, __________ __________, contro

la decisione del Gran Consiglio del 29 marzo 1999 di approvazione del Piano Generale relativo alla costruzione della __________ di __________ - strada principale __________ __________ - __________;

viste le osservazioni 14 settembre 1999 del Consiglio di Stato e del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all'udienza 3 novembre 1999 il rappresentante dei ricorrenti ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di __________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Dipartimento del territorio amm. immobiliare e strade nazionali, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario