Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1999.22 • TRPI TI 90.1999.22 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness

Case Number 90.1999.22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal on April 14, 1999, challenging a State Council resolution from March 10, 1999, which approved a Zoning Plan amendment to suppress restrictions necessary for the construction of a connecting road within a specific municipality. However, the court struck the appeal from the roll because the appellant, through their representative, formally withdrew the appeal via a letter dated June 6, 1999, thereby rendering the case moot, and consequently, no fees or costs were charged.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness: However, the court struck the appeal from the roll because the appellant, through their representative, formally withdrew the appeal via a letter dated June 6, 1999, thereby rendering the case moot, and consequently, no fees or costs were charged.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of petition appealable interlocutory decision transfer rendered moot right of removal objection of unconstitutionality reconsideration of an earlier decision Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1998.120
Withdrawal of Appeal Renders Case Moot
90.1999.64
Appeal Withdrawal Renders Case Moot
90.2001.25
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness
90.1999.35
Petitioner Withdrawal Renders Appeal Moot
90.2001.23
Withdrawal of Appeal on Mootness Grounds

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

The order dictates that no fees or costs are to be levied (which substitutes for the usual cost allocation under a procedural rule).

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.99.00022 · Lugano 8 giugno 1999 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 14 aprile 1999 di

C.E. __________ __________, __________ (__________), rappr. da: __________ __________, __________ __________ (__________), contro

la risoluzione 10 marzo 1999 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la variante di Piano Regolatore concernente la soppressione dei vincoli utili ai fini della realizzazione della strada di collegamento __________ -__________ del Comune di __________ __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 6 giugno 1999 il rappresentante della ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di __________

- Consiglio di Stato, __________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ___________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario