Legislator Case Law & Legislation
90.1999.2 • TRPI TI 90.1999.2 AI generated

Appeal Inadmissibility and Costs Order

Case Number 90.1999.2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Court Costs Borne by appellant

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Planning Tribunal considered an appeal filed on December 30, 1999, by a specific appellant against an unspecified decision, although the judgment ultimately declares the appeal inadmissible and orders the appellant to pay court fees and expenses. The reasoning for declaring the appeal inadmissible is not detailed in the provided excerpt, which focuses only on the final disposition, including the notification of the judgment to the local municipality, the State Council, and the urban planning section.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Inadmissibility and Costs Order: The reasoning for declaring the appeal inadmissible is not detailed in the provided excerpt, which focuses only on the final disposition, including the notification of the judgment to the local municipality, the State Council, and the urban planning section.

Keywords

AI generated
notification of the decision planning costs standing to appeal order to pay proposed judgment challenge of administrative decisions Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order imposes the payment of court fees and expenses on the appellant.

1.

This order rules on the outcome of the appeal (which is declared [omitted text]).

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.99.00002 · Lugano IN_DATA_DECISIONE · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 30 dicembre 1999 di

CE __________ __________ a avv. __________ __________, __________, contro

Per questi motivi,

visti gli art.

dichiara e pronuncia

1. Il ricorso é .

2. Il ricorrente é condannato al pagamento delle tasse di giudizio e delle spese per complessivi fr. .

3. Intimazione: -

- Municipio di

- Consiglio di Stato, ___________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ___________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario