Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1998.98 • TRPI TI 90.1998.98 AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge

Case Number 90.1998.98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appeal filed against a legislative decree concerning regional planning was stricken from the record because the appellants formally withdrew their challenge during the hearing, rendering the matter devoid of object.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge: An appeal filed against a legislative decree concerning regional planning was stricken from the record because the appellants formally withdrew their challenge during the hearing, rendering the matter devoid of object.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of legal petition administrative revocation of decision procedural objections appealable interlocutory decision standing against building permit right of removal Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1997.165
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge
90.1994.109
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge
90.1994.62
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge
90.1994.213
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge
90.1999.16
Appeal Dismissed Due to Withdrawal of Challenge

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

The appeal was removed from the roll because the cause became without object, which is the main order.

2.

No fees or costs were collected as per the order because the case was withdrawn.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.98.00098 · Lugano 24 novembre 1998 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 12 maggio 1998 di

__________ ed __________ __________, __________ __________, contro

il Decreto legislativo del 10 marzo 1998 relativo all'approvazione del__________ (__________-__________);

viste le osservazioni 29 settembre 1998 del Consiglio di Stato e 17 giugno 1998 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all'udienza del 24 novembre 1998 i ricorrenti hanno dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di ______________

- Consiglio di Stato, ___________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario