Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1998.94 • TRPI TI 90.1998.94 AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge to Forest Zone Designation

Case Number 90.1998.94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Planning Tribunal addressed an appeal filed against a State Council decision formally designating a specific parcel of land as forest zone. The court, noting that the appellant's representative explicitly declared the withdrawal of the challenge, determined that the matter had become moot. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls, with no fees or costs to be levied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge to Forest Zone Designation: The court, noting that the appellant's representative explicitly declared the withdrawal of the challenge, determined that the matter had become moot. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls, with no fees or costs to be levied.

Keywords

AI generated
planning costs planning reserve zone amendment of land-use zone tree removal order standing to appeal zoning exclusion Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.2001.69
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge to Forest Boundary Determination
90.2002.78
Complainant Withdraws Appeal Against State Council Forest Boundary Determination
90.2001.27
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Forest Boundary Designation
90.1998.116
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Forest Boundary Determination
90.2002.172
Appeal Dismissed Due to Withdrawal of Challenge Regarding Forest Area Determination

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

This order dictates the removal of the appeal from the court roll because the subject matter ceased to exist.

2.

This order mandates that no fees or costs shall be collected.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.98.00094 · Lugano 26 maggio 1998 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 28 aprile 1998 di

__________ __________ -__________, __________, rappr. da: avv. __________ __________, __________ __________, Contro

la decisione 25 marzo 1998 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato, accertamento formale di zona boschiva della part. __________di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 25 maggio 1998 il rappresentante del ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di __________

- Consiglio di Stato, __________

- Dipartimento del territorio, sezione forestale, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario