Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1998.59 • TRPI TI 90.1998.59 AI generated

Territorial Planning Tribunal Dismisses Appeal as Inadmissible

Case Number 90.1998.59
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Territorial Planning Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed in March 1998 against decisions made by the municipal authority and the Territorial Planning Division, without detailing the specific facts of the case or the precise legal reasoning, by simply declaring the appeal inadmissible and ordering the appellant to pay the CHF 600 judgment fee.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Territorial Planning Tribunal Dismisses Appeal as Inadmissible: The Territorial Planning Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed in March 1998 against decisions made by the municipal authority and the Territorial Planning Division, without detailing the specific facts of the case or the precise legal reasoning, by simply declaring the appeal inadmissible and ordering the appellant to pay the CHF 600 judgment fee.

Keywords

AI generated
planning approval standing against building permit determination of territorial jurisdiction urban problem zoning exclusion duty of spatial planning Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.2002.150
Municipality Appeal Dismissed in Planning Dispute
90.1998.67
Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision Dismissed
90.2000.25
Territorial Planning Tribunal Rejects Appeal Against Municipal Decision
90.1998.161
Withdrawal of Appeal Before Territorial Planning Tribunal
90.1996.45
Territorial Planning Tribunal: Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order imposes the judgment fee (tassa di giudizio) on the appellant.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.1998.59 · Lugano 27 luglio 2001 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Raffaello Balerna, vicecancelliera, Lorenzo Anastasi,Werner Walser

statuendo sul ricorso del 12 marzo 1998 di

__________ __________, __________ __________ contro

viste le risposte:

del Municipio di ;

della Divisione della pianificazione territoriale del Dipartimento del terrtorio;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

ritenuto

in fatto: A.

Per questi motivi,

visti gli articoli di legge applicabili alla fattispecie,

dichiara e pronuncia

1. Il ricorso è .

2.La tassa di giudizio, di fr. 600.--, è posta a carico del ricorrente.

3. Intimazione a: · - -

Municipio di -

Divisione della pianificazione territoriale, ____ _. ________ ___, _____ ____________ -

Consiglio di Stato, Residenza governativa, ____ __________

Il presidente

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Il segretario