Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1998.21 • TRPI TI 90.1998.21 AI generated

Appeal of Territorial Regulation Plan Revision Withdrawn

Case Number 90.1998.21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal challenging a state council resolution that approved the revision of a territorial regulation plan, but the proceeding became moot when the appellant formally withdrew the challenge through a letter dated September 8, 1999, leading the court to strike the case from the record without imposing fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal of Territorial Regulation Plan Revision Withdrawn: A party filed an appeal challenging a state council resolution that approved the revision of a territorial regulation plan, but the proceeding became moot when the appellant formally withdrew the challenge through a letter dated September 8, 1999, leading the court to strike the case from the record without imposing fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
revision of zoning plan withdrawal of legal petition standing to appeal standing against building permit territorial restriction provisional setting aside of opposition Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.2000.42
Withdrawal of Challenge to Municipal Regulatory Plan Revision
90.1998.23
Appeal Against Territorial Plan Revision Struck Due to Withdrawal
90.1996.6
Appeal Withdrawal in Regulatory Plan Challenge
90.2000.72
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Regional Plan Amendment
90.1997.79
Withdrawal of Zoning Plan Amendment Appeal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

The first order simply declares the appeal struck from the roll due to withdrawal, without citing a specific legal article for this procedural action.

2.

The second order specifies that no fees or costs are to be collected, which is a procedural cost disposition, though it does not cite a specific rule number.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.98.00021 · Lugano 13 settembre 1999 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 20 gennaio 1998 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione __________ dicembre 1997 (n. __________) del Consiglio di Stato che approva il PR di __________ (revisione 1995)

viste le osservazioni 13 marzo 1998 del Consiglio di Stato e 9 aprile 1998 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 8 settembre 1999 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario