Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1998.160 • TRPI TI 90.1998.160 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal Renders Forest Demarcation Dispute Moot

Case Number 90.1998.160
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal challenging the demarcation of forest land bordering an area designated for construction within a specific municipality. The court determined that the case was moot because the appellant's representative subsequently informed the court, via a letter dated February 7, 2000, of their decision to withdraw the appeal, leading the court to strike the case from the record without assessing costs or fees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal Renders Forest Demarcation Dispute Moot: The court determined that the case was moot because the appellant's representative subsequently informed the court, via a letter dated February 7, 2000, of their decision to withdraw the appeal, leading the court to strike the case from the record without assessing costs or fees.

Keywords

AI generated
tree removal order demarcation of boundaries right of removal withdrawal of legal petition matter in dispute construction costs Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1998.45
Appeal Withdrawal in Forest Boundary Dispute
90.1998.157
Appeal Withdrawn Regarding Forest Land Demarcation
90.1998.123
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Forest Boundary Delimitation
90.2002.71
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal in Forest Boundary Dispute
90.2000.29
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Forest Boundary Demarcation

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

This order declares the appeal struck from the rolls because it became moot.

2.

This order dictates that no fees or costs shall be levied.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.1998.00160 · Lugano 1 marzo 2000 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 3 dicembre 1998 di

Dr. __________ __________ __________, __________, rappr. da: avv. __________ __________, __________ __________, contro

la delimitazione del bosco a confine con l'area edificabile del Comune di __________ __________ /__________;

viste le osservazioni 22 febbraio 1999 del Consiglio di Stato e 30 dicembre 1998 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 7 febbraio 2000 il rappresentante del ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di ____ _____ __________

- Consiglio di Stato, ___________

- Dipartimento del territorio, sezione forestale, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario