Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1998.152 • TRPI TI 90.1998.152 AI generated

Municipality's Withdrawn Appeal

Case Number 90.1998.152
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A municipality filed an appeal on November 18, 1998, against another party, but subsequently, on March 10, 1999, the appellant formally withdrew the challenge, rendering the case without an object, leading the court to strike the appeal from the rolls without assessing fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Municipality's Withdrawn Appeal: A municipality filed an appeal on November 18, 1998, against another party, but subsequently, on March 10, 1999, the appellant formally withdrew the challenge, rendering the case without an object, leading the court to strike the appeal from the rolls without assessing fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
standing of the municipality withdrawal of petition municipal liability exclusion standing to appeal approval of municipal regulations action for failure to act Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The decision dictates that no costs are to be levied (implicitly referencing the procedural rules for costs, even if not fully detailed, given the context of dismissing the case without charging fees).
AI generated
52.1999.345
Municipality v. State Council: Appeal Withdrawal
90.1996.116
Municipality v. State Council (Appeal Withdrawn)
90.1994.112
Municipality v. State Council (Withdrawal of Appeal)
80.1997.22
Municipality's Withdrawn Appeal of Inter-Municipal Distribution
90.1997.22
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipality and State Council

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The decision dictates that no costs are to be levied (implicitly referencing the procedural rules for costs, even if not fully detailed, given the context of dismissing the case without charging fees).

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.98.00152 · Lugano 15 marzo 1999 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 18 novembre 1998 di

Comune di __________, __________, rappr. da: Municipio di __________, __________ __________, contro

__________

viste le osservazioni 18 gennaio 1999 del Consiglio di Stato;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 10 marzo 1999 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, __________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario