Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1998.133 • TRPI TI 90.1998.133 AI generated

Appeal Mootness Due to Appellant Withdrawal

Case Number 90.1998.133
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A litigant filed an appeal on August 3, 1998, challenging a State Council resolution from April 1, 1998, that approved a specific sector development plan for a municipality. However, the court determined that the case had become moot because the appellant explicitly declared the withdrawal of the appeal via a letter dated January 19, 2001, leading the Planning Tribunal to dismiss the appeal from the docket without assessing costs or fees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Appeal Mootness Due to Appellant Withdrawal: However, the court determined that the case had become moot because the appellant explicitly declared the withdrawal of the appeal via a letter dated January 19, 2001, leading the Planning Tribunal to dismiss the appeal from the docket without assessing costs or fees.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of legal petition appealable interlocutory decision right of removal objection of unconstitutionality planning costs reconsideration of an earlier decision Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This order explicitly determines that no fees or costs are to be collected, applying the rule regarding the non-imposition of procedural costs.
AI generated
90.1998.120
Withdrawal of Appeal Renders Case Moot
90.1999.22
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness
90.2001.25
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness
90.1996.23
Appeal Withdrawal Leading to Mootness Ruling
90.1999.64
Appeal Withdrawal Renders Case Moot

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This order explicitly determines that no fees or costs are to be collected, applying the rule regarding the non-imposition of procedural costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.1998.00133 · Lugano 23 gennaio 2001 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 3 agosto 1998 di

__________ __________, __________, rappr. da: avv. __________ __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione 1. aprile 1998 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva il Piano Particolareggiato del comparto "__________" del Comune di __________ (pubbl. Foglio Ufficiale ____________________ 1998);

viste le osservazioni 5 ottobre 1998 del Consiglio di Stato e 2 ottobre 1998 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 19 gennaio 2001 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - Avv. _______ ___________, ________

- Municipio di ____________

- Consiglio di Stato, _________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario