Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1998.121 • TRPI TI 90.1998.121 AI generated

Mootness of Appeal Regarding Regulatory Plan Amendment After Withdrawal

Case Number 90.1998.121
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appeal was lodged against a State Council resolution approving a Regulatory Plan amendment concerning the inventory of buildings situated outside buildable zones within a specific municipality. However, since the appellant declared the withdrawal of the challenge during the hearing, the court determined the case had become moot and ordered the appeal struck from the records without imposing costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Mootness of Appeal Regarding Regulatory Plan Amendment After Withdrawal: However, since the appellant declared the withdrawal of the challenge during the hearing, the court determined the case had become moot and ordered the appeal struck from the records without imposing costs.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of petition administrative revocation of decision reconsideration of an earlier decision standing against building permit appealable interlocutory decision objection of unconstitutionality Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.2000.83
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Regulatory Plan Challenge
90.2001.28
Appeal Dismissal Due to Withdrawal of Challenge Against Regulatory Plan Amendment
90.1996.89
Appeal Moot Due to Superseding Regulatory Plan Amendment
90.1998.99
Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal for Mootness
90.1997.91
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Regulatory Plan Approval

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This procedural order states that no fees or costs will be levied because the appeal was withdrawn.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.98.00121 · Lugano 11 settembre 1998 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 24 giugno 1998 di

__________ __________, __________. __________, contro

la risoluzione 3 giugno 1998 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la variante di Piano Regolatore concernente l'inventario degli edifici situati fuori dalle zone edificabili del Comune di __________ __________;

viste le osservazioni 23 luglio 1998 del Consiglio di Stato e 17 luglio 1998 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all'udienza 10 settembre 1998 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di ___ _________

- Consiglio di Stato, ________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, _________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario