Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Beyond Statutory Thirty-Day Deadline
Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed an appeal filed on June 18, 1998, against a resolution intimated on April 6, 1998, because it was filed outside the statutory thirty-day deadline applicable to appeals against State Council decisions under Article 38 paragraph 1 of the relevant law (LALPT), noting that the appellant mistakenly believed the deadline was sixty days and that the judicial recess period did not suspend this specific deadline sufficiently to make the filing timely.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 38 cpv. 1 LALPT, Art. 13 LPamm, Non specificato; Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Beyond Statutory Thirty-Day Deadline: The court dismissed an appeal filed on June 18, 1998, against a resolution intimated on April 6, 1998, because it was filed outside the statutory thirty-day deadline applicable to appeals against State Council decisions under Article 38 paragraph 1 of the relevant law (LALPT), noting that the appellant mistakenly believed the deadline was sixty days and that the judicial recess period did not suspend this specific deadline sufficiently to make the filing timely.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedThis article establishes the thirty-day deadline for filing an appeal against decisions of the State Council, which was the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible due to being time-barred.
This article regarding the suspension of deadlines due to judicial holidays was cited in the reasoning leading up to the procedural decision on inadmissibility.
The costs were imposed by order 2, but the specific article governing costs (e.g., Art. 66 LTF or equivalent cantonal norm) is not explicitly cited in that order.
Full text
Incarto n. 90.98.00117 · Lugano 7 luglio 1998 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio
composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca
Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi
visto il ricorso del 18 giugno 1998 di
__________ __________ __________ __________ __________, __________ __________, rappr. da: __________ __________ -__________, __________ __________ __________, contro
__________
ritenuto
in fatto e in diritto
che la contestata risoluzione è stata intimata alla ricorrente in data 6.4.98.
che a norma dell’art. 38 cpv. 1 LALPT contro le decisioni del Consiglio di Stato è dato ricorso al Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio entro trenta giorni dalla notificazione (e non 60 come erroneamente ritiene la ricorrente);
che questo termine è sospeso dalle ferie giudiziarie (7 giorni prima e dopo Pasqua giusta l’art. 13 LPamm);
che il ricorso, interposto il 18 giugno 1998 è largamente fuori termine e quindi irricevibile;
Per questi motivi,
dichiara e pronuncia
1. Il ricorso, tardivo, è irricevibile.
2. La ricorrente é condannata al pagamento delle tasse di giudizio di fr. 100.-
3. Intimazione: - __________ __________, __________ __________
- Municipio di ____________________
- Consiglio di Stato, __________
- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, __________
Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio
Il presidente Il segretario