Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1998.106 • TRPI TI 90.1998.106 AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal Regarding Zoning Plan Amendment

Case Number 90.1998.106
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal against a state council resolution approving a minor zoning plan amendment concerning the introduction of a setback line in a specific location within a municipality's zoning sector. The court noted that the appellant subsequently declared the withdrawal of the appeal via a letter dated October 11, 1998, rendering the case without object, and therefore ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls without imposing any fees or expenses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal Regarding Zoning Plan Amendment: The court noted that the appellant subsequently declared the withdrawal of the appeal via a letter dated October 11, 1998, rendering the case without object, and therefore ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls without imposing any fees or expenses.

Keywords

AI generated
zoning plan amendment of land-use zone standing against building permit withdrawal of petition revocation of a permit right of removal Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This order explicitly dictates that no fees or costs shall be levied.
AI generated
90.1998.125
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge to Zoning Amendment
90.2002.151
Appeal Withdrawal in Zoning Plan Dispute
90.1997.79
Withdrawal of Zoning Plan Amendment Appeal
90.1997.153
Appeal Struck Due to Appellant's Withdrawal of Zoning Challenge
90.1997.43
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Zoning Plan Amendment

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This order explicitly dictates that no fees or costs shall be levied.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.98.00106 · Lugano 13 ottobre 1998 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 27 maggio 1998 di

__________ ____________________, contro

la risoluzione 21 aprile 1998 __________ del Consiglio di Stato che approva la variante di poco conto concernente l’introduzione di una linea di arretramento in località “_________ ___________ ” nel Settore del PR di __________

viste le osservazioni 15 giugno 1998 del Consiglio di Stato e 8 luglio 1998 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 11 ootobre 1998 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di ___________

- Consiglio di Stato, _________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ___________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario