Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1998.104 • TRPI TI 90.1998.104 AI generated

Appeal Against Municipality and Planning Division Declared Inadmissible

Case Number 90.1998.104
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The petitioners appealed a decision, but the facts regarding the specific administrative act or underlying situation being challenged are omitted from the provided text, which only indicates the filing of the appeal against the responses from a Municipality and a Territorial Planning Division. The court ultimately declared the appeal inadmissible, meaning it would not proceed on its merits, and ordered the appellants to bear the associated court fee.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Against Municipality and Planning Division Declared Inadmissible: The court ultimately declared the appeal inadmissible, meaning it would not proceed on its merits, and ordered the appellants to bear the associated court fee.

Keywords

AI generated
standing against building permit action for failure to act standing to appeal planning approval zoning exclusion objection of unconstitutionality Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1998.67
Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision Dismissed
90.2007.171
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Lack of Standing in Zoning Dispute
90.2020.39
Municipality Appeal of Inter-Municipal Development Plan Approval Deemed Inadmissible
90.1996.109
Municipality Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Improper Standing
90.1997.86
Municipal Executive Body Zoning Appeal Inadmissibility

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.La tassa di giudizio, di fr. 600.--, è posta a carico del ricorrente.

This article addresses the imposition of court costs against the appellant.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.1998.104 · Lugano 6 dicembre 1999 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Raffaello Balerna, vicecancelliera, Lorenzo Anastasi,Werner Walser

statuendo sul ricorso del 19 maggio 1998 di

1. __________e __________ __________, __________ __________ __________ 2. ____________________, __________ __________ __________ 3. ____________________ __________, 4. ____________________, __________ __________ 1, 2, 3, 4 rappr. da: avv. __________ __________ -__________, __________ __________

contro

viste le risposte:

del Municipio di ;

della Divisione della pianificazione territoriale del Dipartimento del terrtorio;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

ritenuto

in fatto: A.

Per questi motivi,

visti gli articoli di legge applicabili alla fattispecie,

dichiara e pronuncia

1. Il ricorso è .

2.La tassa di giudizio, di fr. 600.--, è posta a carico del ricorrente.

3. Intimazione a: · - -

Municipio di -

Divisione della pianificazione territoriale, _____ _. _______ __, _____ ___________ -

Consiglio di Stato, Residenza governativa, ____ ____________

Il presidente

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Il segretario