Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1997.63 • TRPI TI 90.1997.63 AI generated

Appeal Dismissed Upon Appellant's Withdrawal of Zoning Plan Challenge

Case Number 90.1997.63
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal challenging a State Council resolution that approved a Zoning Plan amendment for a municipality. The court dismissed the appeal and removed it from the docket because the appellant subsequently notified the court, prior to a substantive ruling, that they were withdrawing their challenge, rendering the matter moot, and consequently ordered no collection of fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Dismissed Upon Appellant's Withdrawal of Zoning Plan Challenge: The court dismissed the appeal and removed it from the docket because the appellant subsequently notified the court, prior to a substantive ruling, that they were withdrawing their challenge, rendering the matter moot, and consequently ordered no collection of fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
zoning plan standing against building permit withdrawal of petition procedural preliminary objections right of removal planning approval Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.2003.55
Appeal Dismissed After Withdrawal of Zoning Challenge
90.2004.60
Property Owners' Zoning Plan Challenge Dismissed Upon Withdrawal
90.1997.34
Zoning Plan Amendment Challenge Withdrawal
90.2002.63
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Zoning Plan Approval
90.1995.34
Petitioner's Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Zoning Plan Amendment

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order rules that no taxes or fees are to be collected, based on the withdrawal of the appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.97.00063 · Lugano 8 ottobre 1997 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 11 giugno 1997 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione 7 maggio 1997 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la variate di Piano Regolatore (Sezione __________) del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 6 ottobre 1997 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di __________

- Consiglio di Stato, _________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario