Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1997.5 • TRPI TI 90.1997.5 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Case

Case Number 90.1997.5
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appeal was filed against a State Council resolution approving several zoning, landscape, traffic, and other planning variants; however, during the hearing, the appealing parties declared their intent to withdraw the challenge, leading the court to rule that the case had become moot and therefore ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls without imposing fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Case: An appeal was filed against a State Council resolution approving several zoning, landscape, traffic, and other planning variants; however, during the hearing, the appealing parties declared their intent to withdraw the challenge, leading the court to rule that the case had become moot and therefore ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls without imposing fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
zoning exclusion withdrawal of petition standing against building permit hearing of the parties appealable interlocutory decision administrative revocation of decision Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This order dictates the disposition regarding costs, stating that no fees or expenses shall be levied.
AI generated
90.1996.112
Withdrawal of Zoning Appeal Renders Case Moot
90.1995.28
Mootness of Zoning Appeal Upon Withdrawal
90.2003.66
Appeal Withdrawal in Zoning Dispute
90.2000.10
Zoning Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal
90.1995.167
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Dispute

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This order dictates the disposition regarding costs, stating that no fees or expenses shall be levied.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.97.00005 · Lugano 13 giugno 1997 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 27 gennaio 1997 di

1. __________ __________ __________, __________,

2. __________ __________, __________,

3. __________ __________, __________,

contro

la risoluzione 23 dicembre 1996 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva alcune varianti delle zone, al piano del paesaggi, al piano del traffico e delle AP-EP, alle NAPR e approvazione del piano dei gradi di sensibilità;

viste le osservazioni 1 aprile 1997 del Consiglio di Stato e 13 maggio 1997 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all’udienza del 12 giugno 1997 le ricorrenti hanno dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _____

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario