Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1997.30 • TRPI TI 90.1997.30 AI generated

Territorial Planning Tribunal Strikes Moot Appeal Against Master Plan Variation

Case Number 90.1997.30
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Territorial Planning Tribunal reviewed an appeal filed against a State Council resolution that approved variations to a Municipality's Master Plan. At the hearing, the representative for the appellants declared the withdrawal of the appeal, leading the Court to rule that the matter had become moot. Consequently, the Court ordered the appeal to be struck from the records and waived any collection of fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Territorial Planning Tribunal Strikes Moot Appeal Against Master Plan Variation: At the hearing, the representative for the appellants declared the withdrawal of the appeal, leading the Court to rule that the matter had become moot. Consequently, the Court ordered the appeal to be struck from the records and waived any collection of fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
planning costs revision of spatial plan town-planning scheme determination of territorial jurisdiction land law planning discretion Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1994.284
Territory Planning Tribunal Dismisses Moot Appeal Over Local Development Plan
90.1994.254
Territorial Planning Tribunal Strikes Zoning Appeal Due to Withdrawal
90.1998.161
Withdrawal of Appeal Before Territorial Planning Tribunal
90.2001.65
Appeal Against Municipal Spatial Plan Withdrawn
90.1994.200
Withdrawal of Appeal Renders Territorial Planning Dispute Moot

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

This order dictates the primary outcome of the decision, which is striking the appeal from the roll because it became moot.

2.

This order dictates that no fees or expenses shall be collected, applying a rule regarding costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.97.00030 · Lugano 15 settembre 1997 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 25 aprile 1997 di

1. __________. __________ __________, __________, 2. __________ __________, __________, 1.,2. __________. __________, __________ __________,

contro

la risoluzione 12 marzo 1997 nr. __________ del Consiglio di Stato che approva alcune varianti del Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________;

viste le

osservazioni 1° luglio 1997 del Consiglio di Stato e 12 agosto 1997 del

Comune di

__________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all’udienza dell’11 settembre 1997 il rappresentante dei ricorrenti ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il

ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non

si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di ________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il

segretario