Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1997.26 • TRPI TI 90.1997.26 AI generated

Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Zoning Plan Variations

Case Number 90.1997.26
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A group of appellants filed an appeal on April 14, 1997, challenging a State Council decision from March 17, 1997, concerning zoning plan variations and a specific area development plan for a municipality. After receiving observations from the State Council and the Municipality, the representative for the appellants declared the withdrawal of the appeal via a letter dated October 30, 1997. Consequently, the Territory Planning Tribunal ruled that the case had become moot, ordering the appeal to be struck from the record without the imposition of fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Zoning Plan Variations: After receiving observations from the State Council and the Municipality, the representative for the appellants declared the withdrawal of the appeal via a letter dated October 30, 1997. Consequently, the Territory Planning Tribunal ruled that the case had become moot, ordering the appeal to be struck from the record without the imposition of fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
zoning plan planning costs revision of spatial plan subdivision of land withdrawal of petition standing against building permit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This order dictates that no fees or costs are to be levied following the withdrawal of the appeal.
AI generated
90.2001.38
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Zoning Plan Amendment
90.2002.151
Appeal Withdrawal in Zoning Plan Dispute
90.2002.63
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Zoning Plan Approval
90.1997.107
Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Zoning Plan Amendment
90.1997.79
Withdrawal of Zoning Plan Amendment Appeal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This order dictates that no fees or costs are to be levied following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.97.00026 · Lugano 4 novembre 1997 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 14 aprile 1997 di

1. __________ __________, __________,

2. __________ __________, __________,

3. __________ e __________ __________, __________,

4. __________ __________, __________,

5. __________ __________ __________, __________,

6. __________ __________, __________,

7. __________ __________ -__________ rappr. da __________ __________, __________,

8. __________ __________ __________ __________, __________,

9. __________ __________ __________ a __________ __________, __________,

1.,2.,3.,4.,5.,6.,7.,8.,9. __________. __________, __________ __________, contro

la decisione 17 marzo 1997 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato relativa alle varianti di Piano Regolatore e al Piano Particolareggiato località agli Orti del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 17 luglio 1997 del Consiglio di Stato e 21 maggio 1997 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 30 ottobre 1997 il rappresentante dei ricorrenti ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Avv. __________ -__________ __________, __________ per __________ __________ (chiamato in causa) - Municipio di ________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario