Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1997.19 • TRPI TI 90.1997.19 AI generated

Appeal Against Unspecified Decision Dismissed

Case Number 90.1997.19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Planning Tribunal addressed an appeal filed on April 1, 1997, against an unspecified decision, which resulted in the dismissal of the appeal and the requirement for the appellant to pay court fees and costs. The tribunal issued its ruling on March 2, 1998, in Lugano, and ordered notification to the local municipality, the State Council, and the cantonal Urban Planning Section.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. della pianificazione del territorio, delle tasse di giudizio; Appeal Against Unspecified Decision Dismissed: The tribunal issued its ruling on March 2, 1998, in Lugano, and ordered notification to the local municipality, the State Council, and the cantonal Urban Planning Section.

Keywords

AI generated
notification of the decision urban planning appealable interlocutory decision standing against building permit urgent preliminary ruling procedure planning permission variance Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. della pianificazione del territorio
This article (whose specific number is missing/redacted) appears to be the basis under which the court makes its ruling regarding the appeal in order 1.
delle tasse di giudizio
This is cited in order 2, indicating the appellant is condemned to pay court fees.
AI generated
90.1997.20
Appeal Withdrawn and Dismissed
90.2003.65
State Council Decision Appeal Withdrawal
90.2007.51
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Against Development Plan Revision
90.2002.150
Municipality Appeal Dismissed in Planning Dispute
90.1998.67
Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision Dismissed

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. della pianificazione del territorio

This article (whose specific number is missing/redacted) appears to be the basis under which the court makes its ruling regarding the appeal in order 1.

delle tasse di giudizio

This is cited in order 2, indicating the appellant is condemned to pay court fees.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.97.00019 · Lugano 2 marzo 1998 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 1 aprile 1997 di

1. __________. __________ __________, __________,

2. __________ __________, __________,

1.,2. avv. __________. __________, __________ __________, contro

Per questi motivi,

visti gli art.

dichiara e pronuncia

1. Il ricorso é .

2. Il ricorrente é condannato al pagamento delle tasse di giudizio e delle spese per complessivi fr. .

3. Intimazione: -

- Municipio di

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario