Legislator Case Law & Legislation
90.1997.18 • TRPI TI 90.1997.18 AI generated

Territorial Planning Tribunal Appeal Admissibility Ruling

Case Number 90.1997.18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs Borne by appellant

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal on March 26, 1997, challenging a resolution issued by an administrative body, with the Territorial Planning Tribunal ultimately declaring the appeal inadmissible and ordering the appellant to pay judicial fees and costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 1, art. 2; Territorial Planning Tribunal Appeal Admissibility Ruling: A party filed an appeal on March 26, 1997, challenging a resolution issued by an administrative body, with the Territorial Planning Tribunal ultimately declaring the appeal inadmissible and ordering the appellant to pay judicial fees and costs.

Keywords

AI generated
planning costs administrative fees order to pay determination of territorial jurisdiction land law standing to appeal Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 1
This provision is cited as the basis for declaring the outcome of the appeal in order 1.
art. 2
This provision is cited as the basis for ordering the appellant to pay court fees and costs in order 2.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 1

This provision is cited as the basis for declaring the outcome of the appeal in order 1.

art. 2

This provision is cited as the basis for ordering the appellant to pay court fees and costs in order 2.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.97.00018 · Lugano IN_DATA_DECISIONE · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

vicecancelliere · Tito Ponti

visto il ricorso del 26 marzo 1997 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione

Per questi motivi,

visti gli art.

dichiara e pronuncia

1. Il ricorso é .

2. Il ricorrente é condannato al pagamento delle tasse di giudizio e delle spese per complessivi fr. .

3. Intimazione: -

- Municipio di __________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario