Legislator Case Law & Legislation
90.1996.93 • TRPI TI 90.1996.93 AI generated

Territorial Planning Tribunal Jurisdictional Appeal Inadmissibility

Case Number 90.1996.93
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs Borne by appellant

Legislator summary

AI generated

In a decision dated September 4, 1996, the Territorial Planning Tribunal addressed a jurisdictional appeal filed by two parties represented by counsel. Although the specific subject matter of the appeal and the precise reasoning leading to the disposition are omitted from the provided text, the Tribunal ultimately declared the appeal inadmissible and ordered the appellant(s) to pay the associated court fees and costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 93 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Territorial Planning Tribunal Jurisdictional Appeal Inadmissibility: Although the specific subject matter of the appeal and the precise reasoning leading to the disposition are omitted from the provided text, the Tribunal ultimately declared the appeal inadmissible and ordered the appellant(s) to pay the associated court fees and costs.

Keywords

AI generated
jurisdictional matters planning costs counsel fees order to pay duty of spatial planning territorial restriction Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 93 LTF

This provision is implicitly referenced as the basis for the decision on the appeal (item 1), although the full text of the article is missing.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is implicitly referenced as the basis for ordering the appellant to pay court costs (item 2).

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.96.00093 · Lugano IN_DATA_DECISIONE · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

visto il ricorso del 4 settembre 1996 di

1. __________ __________, __________,

2. __________ __________, __________,

1.,2. avv. __________. __________, __________, __________ __________, contro

Per questi motivi,

visti gli art.

dichiara e pronuncia

1. Il ricorso é .

2. Il ricorrente é condannato al pagamento delle tasse di giudizio e delle spese per complessivi fr. .

3. Intimazione: -

- Municipio di

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario