Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1996.66 • TRPI TI 90.1996.66 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal and Mootness Ruling

Case Number 90.1996.66
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appellant filed an appeal on February 28, 1996, challenging a municipal resolution, but subsequently informed the court by letter on December 17, 1996, that they were withdrawing the challenge. Consequently, the Territorial Planning Tribunal determined that the case had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls without assessing any fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal and Mootness Ruling: Consequently, the Territorial Planning Tribunal determined that the case had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls without assessing any fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of petition appealable interlocutory decision right of removal administrative revocation of decision late procedural objections preliminary decision Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1996.23
Appeal Withdrawal Leading to Mootness Ruling
90.1996.117
Appeal Withdrawal and Mootness Ruling
90.1995.55
Withdrawal of Appeal Due to Mootness
90.1994.110
Appeal Moot Due to Appellant's Withdrawal
90.2001.109
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

The decision waives the collection of fees and costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.96.00066 · Lugano 18 dicembre 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 28 febbraio 1996 di

__________ __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione municipale nr. __________del ____________________ 1996;

viste le osservazioni 12 luglio 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 21 giugno 1996 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 17 dicembre 1996 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di ________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario