Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1996.63 • TRPI TI 90.1996.63 AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal

Case Number 90.1996.63
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal on February 28, 1996, challenging a municipal resolution dated in 1996 concerning a specific location, but the appellate court noted that the appellant explicitly withdrew the challenge via a letter dated December 29, 1996. Consequently, the court determined the matter was moot and decreed that the appeal was stricken from the rolls, with no taxes or costs levied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal: Consequently, the court determined the matter was moot and decreed that the appeal was stricken from the rolls, with no taxes or costs levied.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of petition right of removal standing to appeal administrative revocation of decision duration of judicial expulsion derogation from law Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1996.66
Appeal Withdrawal and Mootness Ruling
12.1997.143
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal
90.1998.28
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal
30.2004.68
Appeal Withdrawn and Dismissed
90.1994.244
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This provision states that no fees or costs are to be charged, as the case was withdrawn.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.96.00063 · Lugano 7 gennaio 1997 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 28 febbraio 1996 di

__________. __________ __________. __________, __________ __________.__________, contro

la risoluzione municipale nr. __________del ____________________ 1996 "__________ a __________ ";

viste le osservazioni 12 luglio 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 21 giugno 1996 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 29 dicembre 1996 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________ __________, __________

- Municipio di __________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario