Legislator Case Law & Legislation
90.1996.6 • TRPI TI 90.1996.6 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal in Regulatory Plan Challenge

Case Number 90.1996.6
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal against a resolution by the State Council approving a municipality's regulatory plan, but subsequently declared at the hearing that they were withdrawing the challenge, leading the Territorial Planning Court to rule that the matter had become moot and consequently order the appeal to be struck from the rolls without imposing any fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Appeal Withdrawal in Regulatory Plan Challenge: A party filed an appeal against a resolution by the State Council approving a municipality's regulatory plan, but subsequently declared at the hearing that they were withdrawing the challenge, leading the Territorial Planning Court to rule that the matter had become moot and consequently order the appeal to be struck from the rolls without imposing any fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
planning costs standing against building permit hearing of the parties withdrawal of legal petition procedural objections town-planning scheme Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This provision was applied in the dispositive regarding the non-levying of fees and costs.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This provision was applied in the dispositive regarding the non-levying of fees and costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.96.00006 · Lugano 20 marzo 1997 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 19 gennaio 1996 di

__________ __________, __________, rappr. da: avv. __________ __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione __________novembre 1995 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva il Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 21 marzo 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 15 maggio 1996 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all’udienza del 18 marzo 1997 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Avv. _________, _________ - Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario