Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1996.57 • TRPI TI 90.1996.57 AI generated

Territorial Planning Tribunal Dismisses Appeal and Orders Payment of Fees

Case Number 90.1996.57
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal on May 28, 1996, challenging a prior resolution, and the Territorial Planning Tribunal ultimately dismissed the appeal, ordering the appellant to pay all associated court fees and expenses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 28 L. 31.1.1991, art. 35 L. 31.1.1991; Territorial Planning Tribunal Dismisses Appeal and Orders Payment of Fees: A party filed an appeal on May 28, 1996, challenging a prior resolution, and the Territorial Planning Tribunal ultimately dismissed the appeal, ordering the appellant to pay all associated court fees and expenses.

Keywords

AI generated
planning approval order to pay land law determination of territorial jurisdiction valuation proceedings subrogation of the public authority Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 28 L. 31.1.1991
This article is cited as the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible.
art. 35 L. 31.1.1991
This article is cited regarding the decision on costs.
AI generated
90.1995.74
Territorial Planning Tribunal Dismisses Appeal and Awards Costs
90.1996.45
Territorial Planning Tribunal: Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal
90.1995.73
Planning Tribunal Dismisses Appeal and Orders Costs Payment
90.1997.18
Territorial Planning Tribunal Appeal Admissibility Ruling
90.1996.93
Territorial Planning Tribunal Jurisdictional Appeal Inadmissibility

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 28 L. 31.1.1991

This article is cited as the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible.

art. 28 L. 31.1.1991

This article is cited as the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible.

art. 35 L. 31.1.1991

This article is cited regarding the decision on costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.96.00057 · Lugano IN_DATA_DECISIONE · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

vicecancelliere · Tito Ponti

visto il ricorso del 28 maggio 1996 di

__________ __________, __________, rappr. da: avv. __________ __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione

Per questi motivi,

visti gli art.

dichiara e pronuncia

1. Il ricorso é .

2. Il ricorrente é condannato al pagamento delle tasse di giudizio e delle spese per complessivi fr. .

3. Intimazione: -

- Municipio di __________

- Consiglio di Stato, ___________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ____________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario