Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1996.56 • TRPI TI 90.1996.56 AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Zoning Challenge

Case Number 90.1996.56
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A group of appellants filed a petition challenging a State Council resolution that approved a municipality's zoning plan. However, the court noted that the appellants' representative subsequently declared the withdrawal of the appeal via a letter dated November 6, 1996, rendering the matter without object, and therefore decreed that the appeal was struck from the rolls without the imposition of any fees or expenses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Zoning Challenge: However, the court noted that the appellants' representative subsequently declared the withdrawal of the appeal via a letter dated November 6, 1996, rendering the matter without object, and therefore decreed that the appeal was struck from the rolls without the imposition of any fees or expenses.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of petition zoning plan standing against building permit right of removal standing to appeal revocation of a permit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This provision governs the non-assessment of procedural fees and costs in the dispositive order.
AI generated
90.1997.153
Appeal Struck Due to Appellant's Withdrawal of Zoning Challenge
90.1998.125
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge to Zoning Amendment
90.1994.109
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge
90.1994.1
Appeal Withdrawal in Zoning Dispute
90.2002.151
Appeal Withdrawal in Zoning Plan Dispute

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This provision governs the non-assessment of procedural fees and costs in the dispositive order.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.96.00056 · Lugano 7 novembre 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 24 maggio 1996 di

1. __________ __________, __________,

2. __________ __________, __________,

3. __________ __________, __________,

4. __________ __________ __________, __________, rappr. da avv. __________. __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione nr. 1885 del 17 aprile 1996 del Consiglio di Stato che approva il Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 31 luglio 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 8 luglio 1996 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 6 novembre 1996 il rappresentante dei ricorrenti ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di ____________

- Consiglio di Stato, ___________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ___________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario