Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1996.45 • TRPI TI 90.1996.45 AI generated

Territorial Planning Tribunal: Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal

Case Number 90.1996.45
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Territorial Planning Tribunal addressed an appeal filed in May 1996 against a State Council resolution that approved a zoning plan variation for a specific municipality; however, the court recorded that the appellants' representative formally withdrew the appeal via a letter dated June 1, 1999, rendering the matter without object, thus leading the court to dismiss the case from the rolls without assessing costs or fees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Territorial Planning Tribunal: Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal: The Territorial Planning Tribunal addressed an appeal filed in May 1996 against a State Council resolution that approved a zoning plan variation for a specific municipality; however, the court recorded that the appellants' representative formally withdrew the appeal via a letter dated June 1, 1999, rendering the matter without object, thus leading the court to dismiss the case from the rolls without assessing costs or fees.

Keywords

AI generated
zoning plan planning costs revision of spatial plan determination of territorial jurisdiction land law dismissal and abandonment of proceedings Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1996.70
Appeal Withdrawal Leading to Case Dismissal
90.1998.161
Withdrawal of Appeal Before Territorial Planning Tribunal
90.1994.160
Territorial Planning Tribunal Appeal Withdrawn
90.1994.254
Territorial Planning Tribunal Strikes Zoning Appeal Due to Withdrawal
90.1996.57
Territorial Planning Tribunal Dismisses Appeal and Orders Payment of Fees

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This procedural order dictates that no fees or costs are to be charged.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.96.00045 · Lugano 7 giugno 1999 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 2 maggio 1996 di

1. __________ __________ -__________, __________,

2. __________ __________, __________,

3. __________ __________, __________,

4. __________ __________, __________, rappr. da avv. __________. __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione __________marzo 1996 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva una variante al Piano Regolatore di __________o, località __________;

viste le osservazioni 15 luglio 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 30 luglio 1996 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 1° giugno 1999 il rappresentante dei ricorrenti ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario