Legislator Case Law & Legislation
90.1996.29 • TRPI TI 90.1996.29 AI generated

Territorial Planning Appeal Withdrawal and Inclusion of Disputed Parcel

Case Number 90.1996.29
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off

Legislator summary

AI generated

During a site inspection and hearing concerning a territorial planning appeal, the appellant withdrew the appeal regarding one specific property parcel, while the municipality agreed to include another disputed parcel in the new local development plan variant, as it was already present in the plan previously approved by the municipality.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Territorial Planning Appeal Withdrawal and Inclusion of Disputed Parcel: During a site inspection and hearing concerning a territorial planning appeal, the appellant withdrew the appeal regarding one specific property parcel, while the municipality agreed to include another disputed parcel in the new local development plan variant, as it was already present in the plan previously approved by the municipality.

Keywords

AI generated
property development revision of spatial plan planning permission variance subdivision of land town-planning scheme public inspection of plans Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.96.00029 · Lugano 29 novembre 1996 · Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Tribunale della pianificazione del territorioTribunale d'appello

Verbale di sopralluogo/udienza

Sopralluogo

del 28 novembre 1996 a __________

Oggetto:

__________

Ricorrente: · CE __________ __________,__________,__________, __________ __________ e __________ __________, __________,

Dinanzi ai giudici: · E. Beretta, Presidente

Vice cancelliere · D. Regazzi

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

Sono inoltre presenti: · - per il Municipio di __________ __________ municipale, arch. __________ capotecnico comunale

- per il Consiglio di Stato arch. __________ - __________ __________ e il sig. __________

In

sede di discussione il ricorrente dichiara di ritirare il ricorso relativamente

alla part._____.

Per

la part. ___il Municipio si dichiara d’accordo di inserirla nella nuova

variante di PR concernente i nuclei; in effetti la part. risulta già nel piano

approvato dal Municipio.

Firme

dei presenti all’udienza sul verbale manoscritto.

Intimazione:

-

CE _________, _________

-

Municipio di _________

-

Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ___________