Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1996.25 • TRPI TI 90.1996.25 AI generated

Appeal Against Zoning Plan Revision Inadmissibility

Case Number 90.1996.25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Planning Tribunal declared an appeal against the State Council's resolution approving the revision of a Municipal Zoning Plan (PR) and historical center variants inadmissible because the appellant failed to comply with a subsequent 10-day deadline given to complete the appeal filing, resulting in the statutory sanction of inadmissibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Against Zoning Plan Revision Inadmissibility: The Planning Tribunal declared an appeal against the State Council's resolution approving the revision of a Municipal Zoning Plan (PR) and historical center variants inadmissible because the appellant failed to comply with a subsequent 10-day deadline given to complete the appeal filing, resulting in the statutory sanction of inadmissibility.

Keywords

AI generated
revision of zoning plan statutory deadline zoning exclusion zone subject to mandatory planning standing against building permit planning permission variance Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.2015.129
Zoning Plan Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing and Denial of Reinstatement
90.2007.137
Property Owner Appeal Against Zoning Plan Revision Dismissed for Lack of Essential Motivation
90.2008.92
Property Owners' Zoning Plan Appeal Inadmissible Due to Procedural Defects
90.2015.126
Property Owner Appeal Inadmissible Due to Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies on Zoning Designation
90.2008.59
Zoning Appeal Timeliness Challenge

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order relates to the costs, stating that no fees or expenses are levied.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.96.00025 · Lugano 25 marzo 1997 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 6 marzo 1996 di

CE __________ __________ a __________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione __________gennaio 1996 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la revisione del PR del Comune di __________ settori 2 e 3 e alcune varianti del PP centro storico;

visto che alla ricorrente è stato assegnato in data 22 marzo 1996 un termine di 10 giorni per la completazione del ricorso con la comminatoria di irricevibilità in caso di inottemperanza a detto invito;

considerato che al suddetto invito non è stato dato seguito;

dichiara e pronuncia

1. Il ricorso é irricevibile.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di __________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario