Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1996.21 • TRPI TI 90.1996.21 AI generated

Appeal of Municipal Master Plan Revision Withdrawn

Case Number 90.1996.21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party appealed a municipal resolution concerning the revision of the master plan, including zoning proposals for agricultural/protection and residential areas, as well as the traffic plan; however, the court struck the appeal from the record because the appellant's representative formally withdrew the challenge via letter before the decision date, rendering the case without object, and consequently, no fees or costs were charged.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal of Municipal Master Plan Revision Withdrawn: A party appealed a municipal resolution concerning the revision of the master plan, including zoning proposals for agricultural/protection and residential areas, as well as the traffic plan; however, the court struck the appeal from the record because the appellant's representative formally withdrew the challenge via letter before the decision date, rendering the case without object, and consequently, no fees or costs were charged.

Keywords

AI generated
revision of zoning plan municipal building permit charging of fees town-planning scheme revision of a judgment standing against building permit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1995.87
Appeal Against Municipal Master Plan Amendments Withdrawn
90.1995.81
Municipality Withdraws Appeal of Master Plan Revision
90.1996.102
Appeal Struck After Withdrawal of Challenge to Municipal Master Plan
90.1998.150
Appeal of Master Plan Resolution Withdrawn
90.2000.40
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Municipal Master Plan Revision

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

The appeal was removed from the roll because it became moot.

2.

No fees or costs are levied for this procedural disposition.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.1996.00021 · Lugano 15 ottobre 1999 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 11 marzo 1996 di

Eredi __________ __________, rappr. da __________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione __________febbraio 1996 nr. __________ - decisione di alcune proposte di zona AP/EP, di zona residenziale R3 e di Piano del traffico del Piano Regolatore (revisione 1995) del comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 11 aprile 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 27 giugno 1996 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 12 ottobre 1999 il rappresentante della ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - _________ ________, ________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario