Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1996.17 • TRPI TI 90.1996.17 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal Following Master Plan Challenge

Case Number 90.1996.17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal on March 4, 1996, challenging the State Council's resolution approving a new Master Plan for a municipality. However, subsequent to the filing and the submission of observations by the State Council and the Municipality, the appellant formally withdrew the challenge by a letter dated October 21, 1996, leading the court to conclude that the matter was moot and therefore strike the appeal from the rolls without imposing any fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal Following Master Plan Challenge: However, subsequent to the filing and the submission of observations by the State Council and the Municipality, the appellant formally withdrew the challenge by a letter dated October 21, 1996, leading the court to conclude that the matter was moot and therefore strike the appeal from the rolls without imposing any fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of petition late procedural objections planning approval standing against building permit reconsideration of an earlier decision definitive setting aside of opposition Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1998.156
Appeal Withdrawal and Mootness of Master Plan Challenge
90.1997.29
Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Municipal Master Plan Supplement
90.2001.22
Municipality Master Plan Appeal Withdrawal
90.1995.66
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Master Plan Approval
90.1998.29
Appeal Withdrawal Renders Municipal Master Plan Challenge Moot

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

The court ordered that no fees or costs shall be levied, applying a procedural decision regarding costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.96.00017 · Lugano 24 ottobre 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 4 marzo 1996 di

__________ __________ SA, __________, contro

la risoluzione __________ ottobre 1995 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva il Piano Regolatore di __________;

viste le osservazioni 2 maggio 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 23 aprile 1996 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 21 ottobre 1996 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario