Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1996.16 • TRPI TI 90.1996.16 AI generated

Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Land-Use Plan Resolution

Case Number 90.1996.16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appeal was filed challenging the resolution of the executive council that approved a municipality's land-use plan; however, during the hearing, the representative for the appellant declared the appeal was withdrawn, leading the Territorial Planning Tribunal to determine the matter was moot and consequently strike the case from the rolls without imposing fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Land-Use Plan Resolution: An appeal was filed challenging the resolution of the executive council that approved a municipality's land-use plan; however, during the hearing, the representative for the appellant declared the appeal was withdrawn, leading the Territorial Planning Tribunal to determine the matter was moot and consequently strike the case from the rolls without imposing fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
municipal land planning costs town-planning scheme standing against building permit withdrawal of legal petition revocation of settlement permit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1995.24
Appeal of Municipal Land Use Plan Dismissed Due to Withdrawal
90.2002.20
Appeal Withdrawn Against Municipal Land-Use Plan Approval
90.1997.162
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Land Use Plan Revision
90.1997.189
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Municipal Territorial Plan Approval
90.1994.294
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Plan Amendment

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

The decision orders that no fees or costs are to be levied, as the appeal was withdrawn.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.96.00016 · Lugano 30 agosto 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 1 marzo 1996 di

__________ __________, __________, rappr. da: avv. __________ __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione del Consiglio di Stato nr. __________ del __________ ottobre 1995 che approva il Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 2 maggio 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 23 aprile 1996 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all’udienza del 29 agosto 1996 il rappresentante del ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario