Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1996.117 • TRPI TI 90.1996.117 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal and Mootness Ruling

Case Number 90.1996.117
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal on October 17, 1996, challenging the State Council's resolution approving amendments to the municipal development plan. At a hearing on March 4, 1997, the appellant declared their intention to withdraw the appeal, leading the Territorial Planning Tribunal to rule that the case had become moot and consequently ordered the appeal stricken from the record without awarding costs or fees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal and Mootness Ruling: At a hearing on March 4, 1997, the appellant declared their intention to withdraw the appeal, leading the Territorial Planning Tribunal to rule that the case had become moot and consequently ordered the appeal stricken from the record without awarding costs or fees.

Keywords

AI generated
hearing of the parties withdrawal of petition appealable interlocutory decision right of removal administrative revocation of decision late procedural objections Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1996.23
Appeal Withdrawal Leading to Mootness Ruling
90.1996.66
Appeal Withdrawal and Mootness Ruling
90.1995.55
Withdrawal of Appeal Due to Mootness
90.1999.64
Appeal Withdrawal Renders Case Moot
90.2001.23
Withdrawal of Appeal on Mootness Grounds

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

The court ordered that no fees or costs be collected.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.96.00117 · Lugano 6 marzo 1997 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 17 ottobre 1996 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva il le varianti di Piano regolatore del Comune di __________

viste le osservazioni 19 dicembre 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 13 dicembre 1996 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all’udienza del 4 marzo 1997 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: - ________ _____, _________

Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario